Event report: Securing Positioning, Navigation and Timing
Implementation of the Blackett recommendations is being overseen by a UK Cabinet Office Blackett Review Implementation Team (BRIG).
The recently published Blackett report ‚ÄúSatellite-Derived Time and Position: A Study of Critical Dependencies‚Äù concludes ‚Äúwe must take steps to increase the resilience of our critical services in the event of Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) disruption, including by ‚Äúadopting potential back-up systems where necessary‚Äù.
Implementation of the Blackett recommendations is being overseen by a UK Cabinet Office Blackett Review Implementation Team (BRIG). The technical aspects of implementing the recommendations are being led by a Positioning, Navigation and Timing Technical Group (PNTTG), reporting to the BRIG.
Three organisations represented on PNTTG ‚Äì Knowledge Transfer Network (KTN), Royal Institute of Navigation (RIN) and The General Lighthouse Authorities ‚Äì hosted a seminar on 14th June 2018 to review user needs and the status of two possible RF back-up options to GNSS mentioned in the London Economics report on the economic impact of a GNSS disruption.
The event attracted strong interest, with more than 100 delegates, including representation from user communities requiring assured and accurate position or time. Presenter organisations included UK Space Agency, RIN, Spirent, Imperial College Institute for Security Science and Technology, Ursanav and Orolia. Nick Lambert of NLA International facilitated and chaired the event.
The status of two possible RF back-up systems was presented and discussed: enhanced Loran (eLoran) by Chuck Schue, CEO Ursanav, and Satellite Time and Location (STL) by John Fischer, CTO Orolia. Orolia also demonstrated a static STL system as a back-up to GNSS, generating considerable interest amongst delegates.
STL, which is operational and undergoing user trials and evaluation at present, uses the existing Iridium global satellite constellation‚Äôs paging channel to enable a positioning and timing capability on a global basis. Power levels are 1000x (30dB) higher than GNSS, meaning that use indoors becomes possible. STL is currently being evaluated for provision of precise time to financial and government institutions in USA, UK, Italy and Japan. The system uses a narrow-band signal just above the GNSS L-band frequencies. As the signals are encrypted it is practically impossible to spoof STL. The higher power level also offers potential resiliency advantages to GNSS.
eLoran is a ground-based system for time and position, operating in internationally protected frequency bands. The combination of high power and low frequency enables wider coverage than GNSS including indoors and even limited capability under water. eLoran stations are operational to enable precise time in USA (East Coast) and UK. Positioning from eLoran would require additional stations to be made live, noting however that each ground station offers very broad geographic coverage. As well as the USA and UK, other regions offering or considering eLoran type services include Russia, Asia (4 countries including China), Middle East (3 countries) and Australia.
As well as the possibility to consider back-up systems to GNSS on a discrete basis, Orolia and STL shared a white paper on the benefits of an holistic approach to resilient GNSS. The link is provided below.
The seminar concluded by considering some key questions, including how to set up a single UK point of contact for industry and users to increase awareness, share insights and knowledge, and develop a roadmap towards standards and accreditation for resilient systems. This work is being further considered by the organisers, who will report to the next BRIG and PNTTG meetings. Comments and views are invited; please contact RIN, or Bob Cockshott at KTN.